Evening Session — September 25, 2025 FINAL

Alan Clendenin

05:06:31PM We will call this meeting to order. Can we have roll call, please.

Charlie Miranda

05:06:38PM Here.

Guido Maniscalco

05:06:41PM Here.

Lynn Hurtak

05:06:42PM Here.

Bill Carlson

05:06:43PM Here.

Alan Clendenin

05:06:45PM Here.

05:06:46PM Councilwoman Hurtak is not feeling well and attending virtually, which means this will be roll call votes. Can I have a motion to allow council member Hurtak to participate virtually? Motion by council member Miranda and seconded by council member Viera. All in favor, say aye. Opposed. Thank you.

Susan Johnson-Velez

05:07:09PM Susan Johnson-Velez, Legal Department. I want to address item number 1 on the agenda, and I will yield to Mr. Collins, who will clear the remaining comprehensive plan items on the agenda.

Danny Collins

05:07:20PM So item number 1, ta/cpa 24-18. It was scheduled for public hearing this evening. But there was problem with the legal ad. As a result, this item is not properly before you. It was misnoticed and not able to be heard tonight, and we would request that council set a new date for the public hearing on this comp plan amendment. You do have an e-mail from the applicant's representative requesting -- before we realized it was misnoticed -- a continuance. So I guess for consideration now of a rescheduled date of January 15, 2026. And I believe Mr. Hudson is here to address that request.

Alan Clendenin

05:08:00PM Do we need to address it or can we set a public hearing date? Can we have a motion for January 15, 2026 at 5:01 p.m. at 315 e. Kennedy, third floor, Tampa, Florida, 33602. Motion by council member Viera. Seconded from Councilman Carlson. I guess we need to have a roll call on that, as well. Roll call, please.

Bill Carlson

05:08:26PM Yes.

Charlie Miranda

05:08:30PM Yes.

Guido Maniscalco

05:08:31PM Yes.

Lynn Hurtak

05:08:34PM Yes.

Luis Viera

05:08:35PM Yes.

Alan Clendenin

05:08:36PM Yes.

Clerk

05:08:37PM Motion carried unanimously.

Alan Clendenin

05:08:40PM Thank you.

Martin Shelby

05:08:41PM 5:01.

Alan Clendenin

05:08:43PM 5:01 p.m.

Martin Shelby

05:08:48PM I wanted to be clear. Thank you.

Alan Clendenin

05:08:50PM Danny.

Danny Collins

05:08:52PM Danny Collins with your Planning Commission staff. Item 4, a request to withdraw the amendment from tonight's hearing.

Alan Clendenin

05:09:01PM A motion to withdraw item number 4. We have a motion from council member Miranda. Seconded from council member Maniscalco. Roll call, please.

Guido Maniscalco

05:09:12PM Yes.

Lynn Hurtak

05:09:17PM Yes.

Luis Viera

05:09:18PM Yes.

Bill Carlson

05:09:20PM Yes.

Charlie Miranda

05:09:21PM Yes.

Alan Clendenin

05:09:22PM Yes.

Clerk

05:09:23PM Motion carried unanimously to have item number 4 withdrawn.

Alan Clendenin

05:09:28PM Thank you.

Danny Collins

05:09:29PM Danny Collins, again, with your Planning Commission staff. Item 6 on your agenda, ta/cpa25-10. A request from the applicant to continue the public hearing to the October 30, 2025 public hearing.

Alan Clendenin

05:09:45PM A motion to continue item number 6 to October 30. A motion from council member Maniscalco. A second from a council member Miranda. Roll call, please.

Martin Shelby

05:09:52PM Date, time and location.

Alan Clendenin

05:09:58PM Motion October 30, 2025 at 315 e. Kennedy, third floor, Tampa, Florida, 33602 at 5:01 p.m.

Guido Maniscalco

05:10:11PM So moved.

Alan Clendenin

05:10:13PM Roll call, please.

Lynn Hurtak

05:10:16PM Yes.

Luis Viera

05:10:18PM Yes.

Bill Carlson

05:10:19PM Yes.

Guido Maniscalco

05:10:20PM Yes.

Alan Clendenin

05:10:21PM Yes.

Clerk

05:10:22PM Motion carried unanimously. Item number 6 -- to continue item number 6.

Alan Clendenin

05:10:28PM That's it. Motion to approve the agenda.

Lynn Hurtak

05:10:31PM I thought we had number 9.

Alan Clendenin

05:10:34PM Something else? Number 9. We have a motion to continue -- a motion from the applicant -- a note for the applicant to continue number 9 to January 29, 2026.

Charlie Miranda

05:10:51PM So moved.

Bill Carlson

05:10:52PM Second. Do we have to set that one too. Motion 5:01 p.m. on January 29, 2026 at 315 e. Kennedy, third floor, Tampa, Florida, 33602. Roll call.

Luis Viera

05:11:12PM Yes.

Bill Carlson

05:11:13PM Yes.

Charlie Miranda

05:11:14PM Yes.

Guido Maniscalco

05:11:15PM Yes.

Lynn Hurtak

05:11:16PM Yes.

Alan Clendenin

05:11:18PM Yes.

Clerk

05:11:18PM Motion carried unanimously to have item -- to continue item to --

Alan Clendenin

05:11:26PM Mr. Shelby.

Martin Shelby

05:11:28PM Ab2-25-12. A reminder to the public. When you do continue these, they don't receive notice in the mail the way they normally do.

Alan Clendenin

05:11:39PM A motion to approve the agenda.

Charlie Miranda

05:11:42PM So moved.

Guido Maniscalco

05:11:44PM Second.

Alan Clendenin

05:11:45PM Roll call, please. Can we do that by voice.

Martin Shelby

05:11:51PM You can.

Alan Clendenin

05:11:52PM All those in favor say aye. Opposed. Ayes have it unanimously. Very good. Item number two, please.

Guido Maniscalco

05:12:00PM Move to open all the public hearings.

Alan Clendenin

05:12:03PM You are right. Move to open all public hearings. Motion by council member Maniscalco. Seconded from council member Miranda. All in favor, say aye. Opposed? Ayes have it. Mr. Collins.

Danny Collins

05:12:16PM Danny Collins with your Planning Commission staff. Today .I will be presenting ta/cpa25-03. This is the first adoption public hearing for this item. And this is related to the cdb periphery bonus specifically in the Channel District CRA boundaries. Just a quick background, the Planning Commission reviewed this request, and they took action on May 12, 2025. Planning Commission recommended that the request be found consistent with the comprehensive plan on July 31. The City Council reviewed the request and voted to transmit the request to the Florida Department of Commerce. And then today, we are here for the first adoption of the -- first adoption public hearing for this item. I just want to kind of go over the request briefly. This is a privately initiated amendment. It seeks changes to the cdb periphery bonus in the Channel District of January 1, 2025. Currently, projects in the cdb periphery are limited to 100% of the maximum density and intensity. As proposed, problems in the Channel District CRA is up to a 200% increase of intensity and density before the f.l.u. Maximum, doubling the cdb periphery bonus within the district. Every development must meet specific environments in 27-140 of the land development code. So following the July 31 hearing, we transmitted this item to the Florida Department of Commerce and the state reviewing agencies. We received comments back the Florida Department of Commerce, Florida dep, and FDOT. You should have those comments. We sent them -- we transmitted those on September 10. Florida commerce did have some concerns with the request. They recommended that the city not adopt the proposed amendment. Again, you should have those comments. And with that, that concludes my presentation. And, oh, the applicant has submitted a response letter to those doc comments, and you should also have them as well. With that, that concludes my presentation and available for any questions.

Alan Clendenin

05:14:57PM Does council have any questions?

Lynn Hurtak

05:14:59PM Yes.

Alan Clendenin

05:15:00PM Councilwoman Hurtak.

Lynn Hurtak

05:15:02PM Thank you. You said that -- you said that the boundaries were as of July 1, 2025. In the agenda, it says January 1.

Danny Collins

05:15:14PM No, January 1, 2025. My mistake.

Lynn Hurtak

05:15:24PM Just double checking.

Alan Clendenin

05:15:25PM Thank you. Thank you for the clarification. Okay, applicant.

Martin Shelby

05:15:41PM If I can, it was brought to our attention that the timer is not working tonight. What you have in front of you, the red, green and yellow --

05:15:52PM You would have your normal 15 minutes. And members of public, you will have three minutes. And that indication will come from the clerk. Be mindful that the timer doesn't work, but we will be adhering to the standard three-minute rule for public comment. Thank you, Sir. Danny was doing great job tracking with my presentation. As he mentioned, we received comments back from the state. Their main point is they voiced concerns of potentially adversely impacting hurricane evacuation routes. We responded to them. We pointed out the proximity of the Channel District to the cdb and water district one limited density. Further, we provided information how the Channel District is unique and over five hurricane evacuation routes within a mile. You might recall from our transmittal hearing, we entered this into the record. That will show -- there it is. Pointing out those evacuation routes. And we have not received any comments back from the state; however, in researching this further, and this is where it gets really curious, we found comments on our request from the FDOT. So it was Florida commerce that issued the letter talking about hurricane evacuation routes on state roads. FDOT, who is the reviewing agency for state roads, found -- and Addie is putting this up as well, and FDOT said our report has no impact on state research facilities within its jurisdiction. The two directly conflict. I don't know what is going on with the Florida commerce department. We feel we are in compliance with Tampa's comprehensive plan and with the applicable state statutes. Ultimately, we feel this is the decision of City Council. It is clear in the statutes that deference is given to the local jurisdiction. As you found before unanimously, this should be supported, we would hope the same, but we are here to answer any questions that you believe. Ken wants to speak briefly as well even though he spoke this morning. District. Everything I said this morning, I just confirm that here. That's all. I don't have anything else to ask unless you have any other questions.

Alan Clendenin

05:18:31PM Does council have any other questions for the applicant? Council member charleston? Anyone in the public wish to speak to agenda item number 2?

Guido Maniscalco

05:18:43PM Move to close.

Alan Clendenin

05:18:46PM Move to close -- we have a motion from council member Maniscalco to close. Second from council member Viera. All in favor, say aye. Opposed. Ayes have it. Councilman Carlson.

Bill Carlson

05:18:55PM I think in looking at the letter from Florida commerce, the folks South of Gandy hope that is an excuse not to build in certain areas. But the -- I think the argument that Truett made in the letter is sufficient to describe how this area is particularly unique. And also included -- I don't know if you mentioned this right now, there are very few empty spots and very few spots that can be redeveloped. Few four-story buildings. But it is mostly developed already. And with the access to move out easily, it's totally different than on a peninsula in South Tampa and many other areas that might flood. So I am in favor of this. If the state pushes back, it will be interesting to see why considering those arguments. Thank you.

Alan Clendenin

05:19:49PM Anybody else? I am in agreement. I got this -- the letter from the state. It seems inconsistent with what I have seen come out of tallahassee. It is really intellectually inconsistent. I had that briefing when I was speaking with the city attorneys too. I am curious if this is a one-off. And if we challenge and push forward, what their response will be. But I am willing to continue on the course that we had previously set.

Bill Carlson

05:20:17PM Just one more thing. We, as City Council, don't turn down that many -- I think less than 3% of projects, but every time we do, people say you are anti-development, anti-development. Some areas in the city don't want development. Some areas that do. This area, as we know, was -- had different rules that it turned out because of exceptions were changed. So it makes sense to change the rules over there, and allow more density where people want it instead of pushing density where people don't want it.

Alan Clendenin

05:20:57PM Councilman Carlson, would you like to take number two, please.

Bill Carlson

05:21:02PM Sure. I would like to move file number ta/cpa25-03, ordinance presented for first reading consideration. What?

Alan Clendenin

05:21:13PM He seconded it.

Bill Carlson

05:21:14PM Ordinance amending the Tampa Comprehensive Plan future land use section to offer an additional bonus for projects located within the Channel District community development area CRA boundaries as of January 1, 2026. Providing for all ordinances, provided for severability, and providing an effective date.

Alan Clendenin

05:21:32PM Council member Miranda, I would like to take your second, but you were beaten by council member Viera 05:21:41pm with a whisper.

Charlie Miranda

05:21:41PM I challenge it, because I didn't hear the second. [Laughter]

Bill Carlson

05:21:47PM Yes.

Charlie Miranda

05:21:48PM Yes.

Guido Maniscalco

05:21:49PM Yes.

Lynn Hurtak

05:21:51PM Yes.

Luis Viera

05:21:52PM Yes.

Alan Clendenin

05:21:53PM Yes.

Clerk

05:21:54PM Motion carried unanimously. Second reading and adoption will be held on October 23, 2025 At 10 a.m. at old city hall, located at 315 e. Kennedy, third floor, Tampa, Florida, 33062.

Alan Clendenin

05:22:09PM Thank you. Take a little pause -- chair would like to take a pause and introduce a couple of special guests in the audience. Molly, would you like to bring your guests up? Representative from mayor's youth corp and visiting council to watch the inner workings of their local government. I am molly -- come in here. Just two of them. A couple weren't able to make it the last time they came to a meeting, and they wanted to be here. My name is grant Henderson. I go to jesuit, and I am a junior.

05:22:47PM Welcome.

05:22:55PM Welcome to City Council. And I hope you enjoy it and maybe one day you will go to government. We will try not to bore you to death too much. Item number 3.

Danny Collins

05:23:18PM With your Planning Commission staff, Danny Collins, Planning Commission staff. Item number 3, file no. ta/cpa25-05 for the address of East Harbor Street and Channelside Drive. A privately initiated amendment, and the applicant on this application is Port Tampa Bay. The amendment is small scale in size, and subject site is approximately 5.42 acres. Currently, the subject site does not have the future land use designation and requesting the public, semi-public designation on the site. Subject site located in the central Tampa Planning district, in the Channel District, the activity center, and within the coastal high hazard area. It is shown here on our location map. Here is an aerial of the subject site and the surrounding properties. As you can see, the subject site is actually contained surface waters within the ybor channel. Here it is outlined in yellow. The subject site is located of east East Twiggs Street and Channelside Drive and includes surface waters in ybor channel and lies directly to the west of port elm property, serving as one of Tampa's cruise terminals here. To the of West Channelside Drive is a mix of high-density mixed use including residential office and commercial uses. Across the ybor channel to the east over here are lands within the port activity center. While some of these properties are still an industrial use, several future land use amendments east of the channel have occurred converted to industrial lands to the urban mixed-use category. Here is an image of the subject site looking east. Looking at some of the industrial uses looking north of the site. This is looking northwest from the subject site toward the lee Roy selmon expressway. This is looking west. Standing on the subject site, looking across West Channelside Drive. So here is the adopted future land use map. As mentioned previously, the subject site does not have a future land use designation. It is surrounded by rmu-100 to the north and south and also to the west. There is a sliver of heavy industrial lands as well just of the East Channelside Drive right-of-way, west of the subject site. A majority of the Channel District is made up of rmu-100. Pockets of heavy industrial. And as I mentioned earlier, urban mixed use-60 directly across the channel to the east. Again, the subject site is within the coastal high hazard area. This is the proposed future land use map. So this would designate the site as public-semi public. So because this site contains surface waters and currently does not have a future land use designation, there is no potential density or intensity that can be considered on the subject site. As proposed under the public, semi-public designation, maximum cannot be defined at this time. Typically defined during the site plan development phase. The proposed amendment introduces the potential public and supporting public uses on the site. Maximum development potential will be guided with how well the proposed project aligns with the character and the compatibility with the surrounding area. We sent this out to our partner reviewing agencies. We did receive a comment back from the School Board, and both Wilson middle and plant elementary school is been identified as overcapacity at this time. I do want to note this is analysis for adequate facilities and not a determination of school concurrency. This amendment went to the Planning Commission on August 11. They found it consistent with the number of policies in the comprehensive plan. Although the site consists of surface waters, the comprehensive plan allow for future land use designation applied to water bodies under certain circumstances when the project needs overriding public interest and ultimately determined by the City Council. This definition is outlined in pages 9 and 10 of your staff report. Planning Commission found that it met the definition and recommended that the City Council determine that it does meet the overriding public interest definition. The Planning Commission also found that the request supported the Port Tampa Bay and economic development, specifically supportive of the port master plan. And related policy in the plan that support the port. And finally, the Planning Commission found it consistent with policies that kind of spoke to providing public amenities and infrastructure within the Channel District and also in proximity to downtown. With that, the Planning Commission recommended that the request be found consistent with the goals, objectives and policies of the Tampa Comprehensive Plan. And that concludes my presentation. I am available for any questions.

Alan Clendenin

05:29:11PM Council member Miranda, your light was on. Do you want to say something?

Charlie Miranda

05:29:16PM No, I am sorry.

Bill Carlson

05:29:18PM Point of clarification to the public. If you mind going to the picture on the aerial from the beginning. When you -- when you were showing us this, you kind of gestured your hand and said some of that to the right is converted to urban mixed use. I want to clarify that the -- I think it is called the marathon oil gasoline tanks to the south are still industrial based on the other map. So that -- where those -- that is a strategic asset of our region and not urban mixed use, correct?

Danny Collins

05:29:59PM This map will show it better. Yeah, so these are the folios to the east of the channel that were converted to urban mixed use-60. The gas tanks south are on this heavy industrial piece.

Bill Carlson

05:30:17PM I just wanted the public to know that this was not -- that is the reason why our gas station filled up quickly after hurricanes. That's there. Thank you.

Alan Clendenin

05:30:31PM How do we do the slivers of land to the north and to the west?

Danny Collins

05:30:37PM Over here?

Alan Clendenin

05:30:38PM The black there that runs along the water. That runs between Channelside Drive and the water and the north side of the parcel. When they want to unify that as the same future land use?

Danny Collins

05:30:49PM So this -- this parcel is actually -- contained heavy industrial lands. And rmu-100 surface waters and only for the portion of the site that is -- contains surface waters. Applicant can address --

Alan Clendenin

05:31:07PM They will have to do another one to rectify the slivers.

Danny Collins

05:31:11PM Up to the applicant.

Alan Clendenin

05:31:12PM Interesting. Thank you. Very good. Anybody have questions?

Bill Carlson

05:31:18PM I think the problem is that was just water that was never -- never designated, right. The old banana docks. They would unload on the industrial area but the water -- because they are going to fill in the water was never designated and we just need to designate it.

Danny Collins

05:31:36PM Correct.

Bill Carlson

05:31:37PM The banana docks have been done -- the port can tell us -- since the '90s right?

Alan Clendenin

05:31:45PM No other questions? Move on. Applicant. Start with your name, and please hand them to the attorney, and he will distribute them. I am Kevin muneer, certified planner and assisting Port Tampa Bay with this plan amendment. With me are several people who provide legal, environmental, real estate, and engineering services for the port. Hopefully, we can answer any questions that you might have. Port Tampa Bay owns and operates various freight and passenger SHIP facilities in the Tampa Bay area, including the cruise SHIP terminals located in channelside. Our cruise SHIP business has been very successful with growth most every single year. This year, we estimate 372 visits and almost 1.6 million passengers. We have over 50 separate days each year. We have cruise SHIPs moored at each of our cruise SHIP terminals. An additional cruise SHIP terminal will only enhance passenger cruise operations and the logical location at metro port west of the existing terminal. To do this, we need to fill in this slip. While filling a slip will normally be considered land creation, in this case actually restoration of what were uplands that were uplands but dredged decades ago for small freighters. Slips are bigger and have no utility, but filled in can be used for a passenger cruise terminal. I will hand it over to Charles to discuss economic impacts for the port. Before I conclude, we appreciate working with your staff. We agree with their findings of compatibility and our request meets all applicable port policies that promote the redevelopment of under utilized water properties with the focus on water-dependent uses including a new cruise terminal for passenger liner. Thank you.

05:34:14PM Thank you. I seen you way too much this week. Good evening, councilmen, and glad to be here today and a great opportunity for the board. Charles klug, general counsel for Port Tampa Bay. Mention the economic benefits and jobs created, and back in 2023, we had an economic analysis done by a group called martin and associates, and they determined as of 2023, the port was responsible for $36.4 billion in economic impact in the region and supported more than 192,000 jobs. More specifically for this particular matter, that same report determined that cruise SHIP operations of Tampa in 2023 accounted for 2889 jobs based on 249 cruise SHIP calls. That generated approximately 1,125,000 cruise passengers and $537 million in total revenue comes up to $2.16 million per cruise and produced $162 million in total personal income in $17.8 million in state and local taxes. Now in 2024, that increased to 272 cruise SHIP hauls and 1.34 million cruise passengers and $587 million in revenue. Now forward up to this year, 2025, the port is forecasting 372 cruise SHIP calls with approximately 1,596,000 passengers and $803 million in revenue. In fiscal year 2026, which starts next year, we are expecting 395 cruise SHIP calls with approximately 1.8 million passengers, $853 million in revenue and schedules, as Mr. Muneer Mentioned, we have 54 days with three cruise SHIPs each day. That means we need that fourth cruise SHIP terminal. This is the fourth cruise SHIP terminal. Let me talk of jobs, 2889 total jobs in 2023. Also 1323 direct jobs based on those 247 mix. The average pay for maritime workers is $74,350 based on 2023 numbers. That that excludes insurance, retirement, and other benefits that ila workers receive. We had the president of the International Longshoremen's union 1402 scheduled to appear today. He is in South Carolina and was trying to make it back to this meeting, but he wasn't able to make it. That money in 2023 dollars equated to today about $78,878 adjust once you adjust that for inflation. Compares to the statewide ample of $55,000. So we are looking at increasing more jobs and more economic benefit to the area. Some if you have -- if you extrapolate the number of jobs from 2023 to today, 4583 jobs, total jobs, and 2100 direct jobs based on 395 sailings. So in sum, this cruise SHIP operations pays -- creates good-paying jobs and generates $850 million total revenue for the port. We estimated that the fourth cruise SHIP terminal will generate 100 more cruise SHIP calls and approximately 500,000 additional passengers per year. Fourth cruise SHIP terminal, 530 direct jobs and 1160 total jobs. So the proposed plan amendment will allow the port to build this fourth terminal and accommodate Tampa's flourishing cruise market, create additional jobs and increased economic activity in the bay. If you have any questions, I will be happy to answer those. Thank you.

05:38:10PM I am glad you brought up the job issue. Because I think a lot of times that gets lost in the land use hearings and issues that we have of how many jobs are created. We can build all the houses in the world, but if people don't have jobs, they can't afford everything. Very impressive numbers. That is crazy. The most important question. If you build the terminals, you will renumber them? When we first started this back in the '80s and '90s, big red boat linear feet. Now about 1,000 loa. Cruise terminal number 1 garrison lot. Cruise terminal 2 and then cruise terminal 6 and 3. But supposed to be a 4 and 5 between 3 and 6. We can actually count at Port Tampa Bay, but cruise SHIPs got bigger and bigger.

05:39:03PM The Charlie Miranda version of it. Yes, sir.

05:39:08PM Councilman Carlson.

Bill Carlson

05:39:10PM So the first cruise that I took, I thought -- I think it was carnival around 1987. A blue metal building kind of where the starship is.

05:39:24PM You think so. It was not very impressive. But how long the cruise industry been around? The port director back them, sessums, and joe garcia and got us kicked off. A cruise terminal that we can't use anymore because after 9/11, etc. we bought the property in the Channel District for purpose of expanding the cruise SHIP operations.

05:39:51PM I got to ask this because it is good to have it in the record, and in the business journal a couple of years ago, a five-page story that the cruise industry is outdated. Tampa is behind in the cruises, get rid of it and get condos, and that it has no economic impact. You just listed a whole bunch of numbers and give a short answer why we should continue the cruise industry and actually grow it? In Tampa right now. Told by a consultant ten years ago, at this point this time, 600,000 cruise passengers. We are going be at 1.8 million cruise passengers. A great place to cruise from. Water street. Busch gardens. Beaches. Tampa zoo. The Florida Aquarium. Help bring cruises to Tampa. People like cruising from Tampa. We are rated number one cruise ports in the world by carnival from passengers from year to year. A great place to cruise from. Economical vacation for a lot of people and a flourishing business, and we want to take advantage of that. 17% of our revenue. So we are very fortunatem and Port Tampa Bay is so diversified. We have shipyard, oil, gas, aggregates, container, freight, and bulk. We are not relying entirely upon this, but a good piece of business for us.

Alan Clendenin

05:41:11PM May have a wheel over the water. Very good. Anything else from the applicant? Hearing none. No other questions from council. Anyone in the public who wishes to speak to this item? I told you guys you would be sick of me today. Real quick, I have been down there 25 years. A lot of real estate development. I worked closely with the port during that entire period of time. Tampa is very blessed to have a phenomenal aviation and expressway and Port Authority. Not every city can say that. All three of these organizations are top-notch and aid in the economic development of this city. More cruise SHIPs, hooray. Let's go. Thank you.

05:41:58PM Anyone else in the public wish to speak on this item. A motion to close from council member Maniscalco. Second from council member Viera. All in favor, say aye. Opposed. Ayes have it unanimously. Council member Viera --

Lynn Hurtak

05:42:10PM Chair?

Alan Clendenin

05:42:11PM Councilwoman Hurtak.

Lynn Hurtak

05:42:12PM I haven't been able to see people in quite some time. I don't know -- we are still stuck on the wolf.

Alan Clendenin

05:42:18PM We will fix that as we go forward. CCTV, can you ensure when we have public speakers that the --

Lynn Hurtak

05:42:29PM There we go.

Alan Clendenin

05:42:30PM Thank you so much.

05:42:32PM Council member Viera. Viera Viera move the ordinance for first reading. Future land use element and future land use map 1300 East Harbor Street and Channelside Drive, assigning public, semi public future land use designations. Providing for repeal of ordinance and conflict. Providing for severability. Providing an effective date.

05:42:57PM Motion from council member Viera and seconded from Miranda.

Charlie Miranda

05:43:01PM Yes.

Guido Maniscalco

05:43:02PM Yes.

Lynn Hurtak

05:43:03PM Yes.

Luis Viera

05:43:04PM Yes.

Bill Carlson

05:43:05PM Yes.

Alan Clendenin

05:43:06PM Yes.

Clerk

05:43:07PM Motion carried unanimously. Second reading and adoption will be held on October 23, 2025 At 10 a.m. at old city hall, located at 315 e. Kennedy, third floor, Tampa, Florida, 33602.

Alan Clendenin

05:43:27PM See you next month.

05:43:30PM Item number 5.

Jennifer Malone

05:43:32PM Jennifer Malone, Planning Commission staff. I will turn the floor to Meaghan McCarthy, a planner. And first time presenting to council.

Alan Clendenin

05:43:46PM Trial by fire? Should I be good alan or mean alan.

Jennifer Malone

05:43:53PM If it was by fire we would have given her an earlier case.

Meaghan McCarthy

05:43:58PM We will see then. Meaghan McCarthy with Planning Commission staff. This is tpa/ca25-08 located at 2306 North Boulevard. The request is privately initiated small scale and approximately .17 acres. Amount to go from a residential-10 future land use designation to a residential-20. This is the general location of the amendment. Located within the central Tampa Planning district, as well as the redwood park neighborhood. This is an aerial of the subject site with the surrounding area, and the subject site is outlined in pink. The surrounding area is a mixture of uses including single-family detached to the north and west to the south is scattered vacant land and a mix of single-family detached and attached. A look at the photos. This is looking directly at the subject site. This is looking along North North Boulevard with the subject site to the left-hand side. Looking south of our subject site on the right-hand side of the camera here. Next is looking southeast along North Boulevard with the site behind the camera. And then lastly, looking down the alley in the rear of the site. This is our adopted future land use map. Subject site is shown outlined in black and currently under the residential-10 flu category. Subject site is located to the f.l.u. Designation of adopted 22-19. North and west of the south is the r-10 designation. To the east is the r-35. I will try to fix that. The proposed land use map showing the site under the proposed residential-20 designation. Under the adopted f.l.u. Of residential-10, site can be considered for one dwelling unit and considered for 2591 square feet of commercial uses subject to locational criteria. Under the proposed r-20, the site may be considered for three residential uses or 3702 square feet of commercial uses subject to locational criteria. Proposed r-20 will show the increase of residential density and commercial intensity and allow for multifamily uses. And any nonresidential uses will be subject to locational criteria, which is expanded under the r-20 designation. We would like to note that the application was sent to our partner agency and there were no objections to this request. The proposed amendment is recommended to be found consistent with the policies and objectives of the Tampa Comprehensive Plan including compatibility with the surround area. As the proposed amendment was found consistent with existing town homes in the r-35 designation to the east as well as the r-20 parcels directly to the south of the subject site. Additionally encouraging housing supply by finding the amendment consistent with infill policies. The recommendation by the Planning Commission staff is that the proposed amendment be found consistent with the Tampa Comprehensive Plan. And this concludes my presentation. I am available for any questions.

Alan Clendenin

05:47:42PM Thank you. It is like you have done that for 20 years.

Meaghan McCarthy

05:47:45PM Thank you.

Alan Clendenin

05:47:46PM Good job. Applicant. Thank you, Megan. You did a great job. Hopefully that makes our presentation shorter which I hope I think you all want.

05:48:14PM Absolutely. Way to read the room. I do not have an open photograph but the home on the site has been demolished as of last week or the last few days. The property to the south look like this because the future land use is r-20 on those and its projects rezoned and allowed ready under way. I know when we spoke with the ridgewood civic association, something we would be hoping would be moving forward quickly with those projects so I wanted to put that on the record. The reason for the request to accommodate residential density in the area changing the land use to r-20. Trying to do that in a sensitive way. Property to the of East North Boulevard is r-35. Property to the west is r-10 and asking for r-20 for a gentle modest increase of residential density that makes sense in the context. I am going to go through all the different land use policies that cited in support in the Planning Commission and city reports. But common theme that emerges is connection, neighborhood stability and connections to neighborhoods and all the great things happening in the rest of Tampa. And with that, I request that this be approved anybody in the public discuss. Motion to close from council member Maniscalco and seconded from council member Miranda Guido Maniscalco, you can read it.

05:50:33PM Can she makes motion?

Clerk

05:50:38PM Hurtak, we can't hear you.

Guido Maniscalco

05:50:41PM Ma'am, you are muted.

Alan Clendenin

05:50:44PM Councilwoman Hurtak, we can't read lips.

Martin Shelby

05:50:50PM You read motion --

Alan Clendenin

05:50:53PM Would you be --

Lynn Hurtak

05:50:54PM I am unmuted. I can read.

Alan Clendenin

05:50:56PM We can hear you. If you would like to read, you can.

Lynn Hurtak

05:51:01PM No problem, file number ta/cpa25-08, ordinance for first reading consideration. Ordinance amending the Tampa Comprehensive Plan, future land use element, future land use map for the property located at 2306 North Boulevard from residential-10, r-10 to residential-20, r-20 for repeal of all ordinances, providing for severalability and providing an effective date.

Alan Clendenin

05:51:27PM Motion from Councilwoman Hurtak and seconded from council member Maniscalco.

Lynn Hurtak

05:51:33PM Yes.

Luis Viera

05:51:35PM Yes.

Bill Carlson

05:51:35PM Yes.

Charlie Miranda

05:51:37PM Yes.

Guido Maniscalco

05:51:38PM Yes.

Alan Clendenin

05:51:39PM Yes.

Clerk

05:51:40PM Motion carried unanimously. Second reading and adoption will be held on October 23, 2025 At 10 a.m. at old city hall located at 315 Kennedy Boulevard, third floor, Tampa, Florida, 33602.

Alan Clendenin

05:52:00PM See you next month. Item number 7. Staff.

Quinn Steele

05:52:04PM Good evening, council, Quinn Steele, map presenting a map amendment for W. Euclid Avenue. The request to change the future land use designation from residential-20 to residential mixed use-35. Here is a general location map. Subject site is located within the South Tampa Planning district in the fair manhattan neighborhood. Aerial of the subject site outlined in yellow. To the south is britton plaza. And tonight, west along euclid is residential office and commercial uses and to the north and east are single family homes. This is a photo looking south on W. Euclid Avenue directly at the subject site, which is the vacant parcel and further south is britton plaza. These are the residential office uses to the west and the subject site is out of frame on the right. These are the properties to the north across W. Euclid Avenue. And the property directly east of the subject site. The adopted future land use map designates this site as residential-20 which allows up to 20 dwelling units per acre and limited neighborhood serving commercial and residential office uses at.5 f.a.r. If locational criteria. East and west is residential-20. To the north is r-10 and further east and west on dale mabry and himes are r-35. Cmu-35, 35 dwelling units per acre and a 2.0 f.a.r. Under the existing r-20 designation, site considered for six dwelling units or 6700 square feet of nonresidential uses subject to locational criteria with the proposed cmu-35, to ten building units per acre or over 37,000 -- ten units or 27,000 square feet of residential or nonresidential development. If approved, already have commercial general use and increase potential density and intensity of the site. The proposed amendment is consistent with several objectives and policies of the comprehensive plan. And promoting density of transit of a mixture of uses north of britton plaza a major commercial hub and a HART transit center and east of dale mabry, a transit emphasis. We sent this request in and there were no objections. The Planning Commission recommends that the proposed map amendment be consistent with the goals, policies of the Tampa Comprehensive Plan, and I am available for any questions.

Alan Clendenin

05:55:03PM Any questions? Hearing none. Applicant, please. Drive. I will jump right in the main portion of our presentation here. We represent bricks moore property group. They are our client and the landowner is britton plaza. When they acquired this, they acquired what we are calling an outparcel along Euclid Avenue, which is part of the larger deal. They are focused on owning and maintaining open-air retail center. They own 360 or so plazas across the united states. And so in predominantly commercial uses and filing request for commercial use on the site. A little background, a companion rezoning has been filed that will come before you next month to CG. But commercial general is not consistent with r-20. We had to go change the land use to allow commercial uses. The request we have before you this evening. We believe there is inherent justification. R-20 exists along the strip north of britton plaza and south of euclid. But just east of the dale mabry intersection. All of those uses have since transferred to commercial type uses. Some of that pattern is very prevalent along that strip, and we feel that a single-family home is not as compatible on this site given the magnitude of the operations of the plaza to the south. This request furthers many goals, policies, and objectives of the plan. These are in the staff report. I will not read them out, but the key takeaway here is that the plan does mention a city-wide demand for retail and services, as well as those uses that are employment generators. A commercial use. Staff found this application consistent. And we were at the Planning Commission board last month august where they unanimously recommended a consistency finding. That is the end of my presentation. I am here to answer any questions.

05:57:37PM Anyone to speak? Motion to close from council member Miranda. Seconded from council member Maniscalco.

Guido Maniscalco

05:57:43PM I got my first speeding ticket down the street --

Alan Clendenin

05:57:48PM Your first, not your last?

Guido Maniscalco

05:57:50PM Ordinance presented for first reading consideration. Amending the comprehensive plan, future land use element, future land use map at the part 3618 w. Euclid from residential-20, r-207 to residential mixed use cmu-35. Providing for severability and providing for an effective date.

Alan Clendenin

05:58:11PM Motion from council member Maniscalco and seconded from council member Miranda.

Bill Carlson

05:58:15PM Yes.

Guido Maniscalco

05:58:20PM Yes.

Charlie Miranda

05:58:22PM Yes.

Luis Viera

05:58:23PM Yes.

Alan Clendenin

05:58:24PM Yes.

Clerk

05:58:25PM Second reading October 23, 2025 At 10 a.m. at old city hall located at 315 e. Kennedy, third floor, Tampa, 33602.

Those Leaving At 5

05:58:40PM 58, you are welcome. Next two items number 8 and 10 are quasi-judicial. If you Planning to speak to these items, stand, raise your right hand, and be sworn by our clerk. [Swearing in]

Alan Clendenin

05:59:00PM Thank you. Go ahead.

Leo Debardeleben

05:59:01PM Good evening, council and Chair. Leo Debardeleben. Agenda item number 8 is a request for a property located at 1616 east 7th avenue, unit number 1624. Owner of the property is pedroso lcc and applicant is represented today by Mr. Steve Michelini. Request for alcoholic beverage sales small venue for beer and wine, consumption on premises only. Total area proposed for alcoholic beverage sales is 16,563 square feet, which is the entire second floor of the indoor space only. And I will show that you on the site plan and in photos. The applicant is proposing alcoholic beverage sales hours consistent with chapter 14. And there is no outdoor areas -- sales areas or outdoor sound permitted on your screen is the aerial foe of the site. The property is in Ybor City outlined in red. The buildings go up to the --

Alan Clendenin

06:00:10PM CCTV.

Leo Debardeleben

06:00:40PM The site is zoned commercial central core. It is located in the -- in the central Tampa Planning district, the Ybor City has been a village and along the mixed use corridor. This is a site plan that was submitted by the applicant. Like I said, the building goes -- takes up the entire property. The proposed ab sales area is the entire second floor of the subject site, which is currently the crest building. There are a mixture of uses within the building currently, including a restaurant and retail on the first level and retail and office uses on the second and third levels. I have some photos of the site. This is about the best photo of the front elevation that I can get without being blocked by the awnings. This is on east 7th avenue within that central commercial core. Facing east on east 7th avenue. Site is right here on the right. That was facing west. This is facing west. Sorry about that. Facing east on east 7th avenue. Site is behind us on the left. This is directly across the street. This is a rear elevation of the site. This is from east 8th avenue. This is facing west on east 8th avenue. The site is on our left. This is facing east on east 8th avenue. The site is on our right. This is across the street from our site on east 8th avenue. And just another photo of east 8th avenue with the site behind us. Development Coordination reviewed the action and find the request inconsistent with the applicable City of Tampa land development regulations due to the waivers requested for the it is requirements from other ab sales area. Transportation staff finds the request consistent. Minor site plan modifications will be required between first and second reading should it be council's pleasure to approve. I am available for any questions.

Alan Clendenin

06:03:08PM Any questions? Applicant. Steve Michelini, representing the petitioner. This is approximately 16,500 square feet in the old crest building. Yc-1. A three-story building with other uses including a restaurant on the first floor, which is the distance waiver that the City staff objected too. Only applied to the second floor for an art gallery, art studio, and retail sales. A small venue which means less than 300 occupants. Consumption on premise for beer and wine. Do not compromise the health, safety and welfare of any individual or property owner. Complies with the regulations established by the city. It is compatible with all of the other use. It complies with the comprehensive plan. It does not establish a precedent. Ingress and egress remain the same. Parking is existing and remains the same. The light -- lighting, safety, utilities, drainage all remain the same but it is an existing building, and it does not change or establish any development precedent that will be adverse to any of the property owners. It is consistent with all of the general conditions. And we respectfully request your approval.

06:04:35PM Does council have any questions?

Guido Maniscalco

06:04:41PM Yes, real quick. Clarification, this is a second floor?

Lynn Hurtak

06:04:45PM I have a question.

Alan Clendenin

06:04:46PM Councilwoman Hurtak.

Lynn Hurtak

06:04:48PM Why just the second and not the third?

06:04:56PM Oh, okay.

06:05:01PM Okay. Thank you.

Alan Clendenin

06:05:03PM Anyone in the public wish to speak to this item? Motion to close from someone?

Guido Maniscalco

06:05:08PM So moved.

Alan Clendenin

06:05:09PM Motion to close from council member Maniscalco. Second from Councilman Carlson. All in favor, say aye. Opposed. Ayes have it. Council member Miranda, would you like to read this item.

Charlie Miranda

06:05:20PM I pass.

Alan Clendenin

06:05:23PM Councilman Carlson.

Bill Carlson

06:05:25PM Move file number ab2-25-60, ordinance being presented for first reading consideration. Ordinance approving a special use permit su-2 with alcoholic beverage sales, small venue on premise and making lawful sale of beer and wine out of that certain lot, plot or track of land. Second floor only. Tampa, Florida more particularly described in section 2 providing all ordinance or parts of ordinances are repealed, repealing for severability, and providing an effective date.

Alan Clendenin

06:05:59PM All in favor, say aye. Roll call vote, please, excuse me.

Charlie Miranda

06:06:05PM No.

Guido Maniscalco

06:06:07PM Yes.

Lynn Hurtak

06:06:10PM Yes.

Luis Viera

06:06:11PM Yes.

Bill Carlson

06:06:12PM Yes.

Alan Clendenin

06:06:13PM Yes.

Clerk

06:06:15PM Motion carried with Miranda voting no. second reading and adoption will be held on October 23, 2025 At 10 a.m. at old city hall, located at 315 e. Kennedy, third floor, Tampa, Florida, 33062.

Alan Clendenin

06:06:31PM Thank you.

06:06:33PM Council member Maniscalco.

Guido Maniscalco

06:06:35PM On item number 10, Mr. Shelby, 4121 Henderson Boulevard. My dad's store is two spaces over. So, like 20 feet away from this. My dad rents. He doesn't own. My dad is not -- it is a retail store. Nothing to do with beer and wean. What do you -- what do you recommend out of an abundance of caution. He has no financial interest. I don't even think he know this is happening.

Martin Shelby

06:07:06PM Florida statutes requires you to abstain if you have a voting conflict and the basis is financial interest. And he doesn't an ownership interest here. And ultimately, the question is, can you be fair and impartial and base your decision on the evidence in the record?

Guido Maniscalco

06:07:26PM Yes.

Martin Shelby

06:07:27PM I do not see a legal basis for a financial conflict so therefore my professional opinion under Florida statutes, you have an obligation to vote.

Guido Maniscalco

06:07:35PM And he is also in the process of retiring. And moving -- you know, moving away. So I should be okay. Okay.

Alan Clendenin

06:07:45PM Okay. Very good.

Leo Debardeleben

06:07:48PM Good evening council and chairman. Again, Leo Debardeleben, Development Coordination. Item number 10, sb 225-18, Henderson Boulevard. Applicant is represented today by Megan smith. Request for alcohol beverage sales, small venue, beer and wine for consumption on premise and package sales off premise. Limited to indoor space only totaling 966 square feet no outdoor areas included. On your screen is the aerial map of the property. Subject site is out lined in red. Along the commercial corridor that runs along Henderson Boulevard. This is in -- this is located inside of a commercial strip center. The parking is in front of the building, which also has access from Henderson. Parking in the front. Additional parking spaces in the back that I can show you on the site plan. The unit is currently a vacant commercial space and proposed to be established as a bar lounge for beer and wine. Consumption off premise for package sales consumption. The sales area is entirely indoors. This is the site plan made by the applicant. Proposed sales area is the entire unit. This is Henderson Boulevard here, and there is an alley in the back where he can get access to the other parking spaces. With the parking spaces in the front as well. Photos of the site. This is the front elevation the proposed sales area. This is just a view from across the street so you can get an idea about the strip center. This is facing northeast on Henderson Boulevard. Site is on our left. Facing on South Henderson Boulevard, the site is directly behind us. Facing southwest on Henderson boulevards. This is a rear elevation of the subject site, and this is where the proposed parking will be provided. This is just the site of the other side. This is east -- I am sorry, North Clark Street here. This is estrella and cameron court. Development board staff has found it inconsistent with the applicable City of Tampa due to the waivers for distance requirements from residential and other ab sales establishments. Transportation find the request consistent. Minor site plan modifications would be required between first and second reading if council would move to approve. I am available for any questions.

Alan Clendenin

06:10:53PM Any questions? Applicant? Behalf of spiro's wine for the site located on Henderson Boulevard. Leo did a good jo,b and I will be brief to see if he can get out in record time. Site is zoned commercial general. Small venue, beer and wine. Asking on-premise and off-premise and 966 square feet of space. All parking is being provided. There is the site plan. So spiros wines. Some of you know it as the online distributor. A Tampa-Based family business. They are really curating that small winery ability and things you wouldn't find every day in the store. Through word of mouth, they have grown in the Tampa area and they are looking for a storefront location. From online to storefront, feel of where the place is. One of those where the zoning code definition and what actually is happening is a little confusing. So we wanted to make it very clear what the intent is. A third of it will be for a walk-in wine cellar. A retail area and a small tasting. On-premise for tasting events. Wineries come in and things like if you want to try some wine before you buy the whole case and went about your day. We are requesting two areas to the part of. Pete's bar to the west closer to lois and residential units behind us on the alley way. Those are those two waivers that we are requesting. We feel it is compatibility on Henderson and the uses that are there and a very small boutique type use with more of a retail store than a bar-lounge hour and enclosed to the indoor facility only. With that, I will be available for any questions if you have any.

06:13:13PM Council, any questions? Pete's bar, the best karaoke in time. Hearing no questions. Then in the public who wishes to speak to this item? Hearing none. Motion to close from council member Miranda. Seconded from council member Maniscalco. All in favor, say aye. Opposed. Ayes have it unanimously. And we left off with -- council member Miranda, would you like to read this one?

Charlie Miranda

06:13:44PM Item number 10, ab -- ordinance for first reading consideration. Ordinance rezoning -- approving a special use permit su-2 for alcohol beverage sales, small venue consumption on premise. And off-package consumption and sell of beer, wine and liquor for certain lot, plot, or tract of land 411 Henderson Boulevard more particularly described in section 2 providing all ordinances and parts of ordinances are repealed, providing an effective date.

Luis Viera

06:14:21PM Second.

06:14:23PM Yes.

Bill Carlson

06:14:24PM Yes.

Charlie Miranda

06:14:26PM Yes.

Guido Maniscalco

06:14:27PM Yes.

Lynn Hurtak

06:14:28PM Yes.

Alan Clendenin

06:14:30PM Yes.

Clerk

06:14:31PM Motion carried unanimously. Second reading and adoption held on October 23, 2025 At 10 a.m. at old city hall located at 315 e. Kennedy, third floor, Tampa, Florida, 33062.

Alan Clendenin

06:14:46PM Yes, ma'am.

Susan Johnson-Velez

06:14:47PM Susan Johnson-Velez. Legal Department. Before you move continue to information and new business. I did want to introduce, if I may, our legal intern for the semester, dylan. Wave. Dylan is a third --

Alan Clendenin

06:15:02PM You have to walk up to the podium.

Susan Johnson-Velez

06:15:04PM A third-year law student at steton and . He is with interning us, and attended some of the briefings. And some of you were on line and it's good to put a name with a face and introduce dylan. May see him through the next couple of months.

Alan Clendenin

06:15:23PM Would you like to say something. Nice to meet you all in person for those I have not met so far. And I am very interested in getting to see more of how this city operates.

06:15:33PM Very nice. Welcome on-board.

06:15:37PM That concludes the business of Tampa City Council evening session at 5:01 p.m. -- whatever it is. I don't know. Anyway, new business. Councilman Carlson.

Bill Carlson

06:15:50PM When we had the last budget hearing, the CFO presented the total debt of the city. And there was a new line in there about the pension debt. And I had some questions from the public about that. So I would like to make a motion to ask City staff to give a report on January 28 as to the health of Tampa's pensions. 06:16:14pm and explanation of the pension debt reported during the budget presentation.

Charlie Miranda

06:16:19PM Second.

Bill Carlson

06:16:21PM I picked a workshop date. We can do it another date --

Alan Clendenin

06:16:26PM Not January 28. We have a workshop on January 29.

Bill Carlson

06:16:31PM 29th. That is what I meant.

Alan Clendenin

06:16:35PM A motion from Councilman Carlson and seconded from council member Miranda to ask staff to return on October 27 for the briefing of the health of Tampa's pensions.

Bill Carlson

06:16:44PM To explain -- I have it written down, explain what the debt meant.

Alan Clendenin

06:16:50PM Give it to the clerk. All in favor, say aye. Opposed. Ayes have it unanimously. Thank you, Councilwoman Hurtak. Council member Viera.

Luis Viera

06:16:58PM Yes, sir. Two quick ones. I have sent y'all a memo on this CDs Roosevelt apartment veteran initiative on Nebraska and that colonel dj reyes wants a letter of support from council. It does not mean monetary support, but just support because they are looking at bodies to support it. I sent that information. I hearby make a motion for a letter in support of this. And that's it.

Lynn Hurtak

06:17:28PM Second.

Alan Clendenin

06:17:30PM A motion from council member Viera and seconded from Councilwoman Hurtak. All in favor, say aye. Opposed, ayes have it unanimously.

Luis Viera

06:17:38PM Second and last, if I may. I motion on the k-bar ranch park that we got the design. I motioned for Parks and Recreation to report back on October 23 in a written staff report on the date of the RFQ for the k-bar ranch design and when it will be publically posted for bid, as well as the status of community meetings because part of that design includes community meetings. I am doing this because, you know, we funded design last year. And I just want to make sure that we are 100% on this. Because if you guys remember, the -- in the beginning of Mayor Castor's term, there was a parks master plan done. And district 7 was highlighted really as part of Tampa that has as big park deficit. If you look at really north of Tampa Palms, north of just -- headed up north to the k-bar ranch area, West Meadows, efforts. That area really nothing there from the City of Tampa. Some this would really, really go a long way in doing this. So I want to keep tabs on this. I know a lot of people at k-bar ranch are very excited, including folks from the indian-american community and have a cricket component. If I may, my motion for October 23.

Alan Clendenin

06:19:00PM Okay. Just written, because it is pretty crowded.

Luis Viera

06:19:05PM Yes, sir. Seconded from council member Miranda. All in favor, say aye. Opposed. Ayes have it. Council member Maniscalco.

Guido Maniscalco

06:19:12PM None.

Charlie Miranda

06:19:13PM Receive and file.

Alan Clendenin

06:19:16PM Councilwoman Hurtak, any new business?

Lynn Hurtak

06:19:19PM No, thank you.

Alan Clendenin

06:19:20PM Mr. Shelby.

Martin Shelby

06:19:22PM I would like remind the council and bring tonight public's attention that the month of October only the calendar for council business is very different. Normally, the council meets in regulars session on the first and third of the month. But the CRA is usually the second Thursday of the month and workshop is usually the third of the month, the third Thursday. October has five thursdays. But please be reminded that October 2, next Thursday, is a jewish holiday and per council's calendar, there will be no meeting. And what would normally be a CRA meeting is going to be council's first meeting in October when it returns on October 9. So I would just remind council and the public that there is no council meeting next week, Thursday, October 2. And to consult council's calendar online on the City Council's calendar on the web page for how the meetings will be so you will not be disappointed or surprised by October's different schedule. Thank you.

Alan Clendenin

06:20:28PM What are people going to watch next Thursday? [Laughter] very good. We have a motion to receive and file from Councilman Miranda. Seconded from council member Maniscalco. All in favor, say aye. Say aye. Opposed. Ayes have it unanimously. We are adjourned. Disclaimer: this file represents an unedited version of realtime captioning which should neither be relied upon for complete accuracy nor used as a verbatim transcript. Any person who needs a verbatim transcript of the proceedings may need to hire a court reporter. ▶ meeting video the information contained in these pages represents an unedited version of realtime captioning which should neither be relied upon for complete accuracy nor used as a verbatim transcript. Persons requiring a verbatim transcript may need to hire a court reporter. © - City of Tampa (813) 274-8211